James Damore, now a former Google employee, caused outrage within Google Inc when he circulated a manifesto on Friday, 4th August complaining about this Tech monolith’s “ideological echo chamber,” while also asserting women have lower tolerance for stress, and that ‘conservatives’ are indeed more conscientious.
By the following Monday, this alumni of Harvard, Princeton and MIT, and who worked at Google’s Mountain View HQ, found himself fired after the search giant’s Indian chief executive, Sundar Pichai, claimed portions of Damore’s 10-page memo:
violate our code of conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes
Perhaps inspired by his dualistic Hindu background, Pichai also managed to say, in the very same memo, that Google employees shouldn’t be afraid to speak their minds!
Mr. Damore has since been informally interviewed by the University of Toronto’s professor of psychology, Jordan Peterson, to discuss the circumstances leading up to him penning his controversial memo, as well as the half-crazed fallout that has ensued since. This must-see interview can be found uploaded to YouTube.
Damore proceeds to explain that he decided to write his memo after attending a ‘secretive’ Google “diversity summit” in which he says presenters talked about “potentially illegal practices” designed to “try to increase diversity … basically treating people differently based on what their race or gender are.”
During his interview with Professor Peterson, Damore also discloses how he originally published his memo over a month ago but upper-management largely ignored it until it started to attract media attention. Once it went ‘viral’ Google’s upper management (a female in this instance) initiated what quickly grew into a coordinated attack using factual misrepresentations in order to try and silence him.
* * *
This kind of Communistic or Bolshevik or “Extreme Left” social engineering chimes with my own employment experiences in the U.K. during 1998 (with a private company in Southampton, who employed a young, female, Human Resources Officer), and again during 2004-05 in Doha, Qatar, when I was employed by the California based Occidental Petroleum Limited.
In the case of Occidental’s (onshore/offshore) operations in Qatar, White Males were quietly discriminated against by the company’s American management, while concurrently those employees recruited from the Indian sub-continent where given favors or ‘protection’.
Wherever you go in this “New World Order” world, I can guarantee that you will find Indians enjoying far greater leeway, which then encourages them to display an arrogance that stems from knowing they are being subtly favoured (as a racial group) by all upper corporate management. In other words I witnessed, and was often troubled by, a surprisingly overt (semi-official) policy whereby employees were being treated differently according to (in this case) their racial background.
In Book-1 of Outsourced World, I make it clear that this expression of reverse-racism actually forms an intrinsic part of the underlying philosophy that has helped propel the “New World Order” to giddying heights as we continue to be corralled, like sheep, towards One World Governance, and a potentially stark existence as perpetual serfs.
* * *
I would also suggest to you that this world has been thoroughly subverted, perverted and fractured by the social, political, and sexual deviances pouring out of the United States of America since the 1960s. And especially since the 1990s (i.e., the “Clinton Era”).
I now argue that the entire Western World (outside of North America) must soon learn how to deal very roughly with Americans and their arrogant predilection for interference in the domestic affairs of all other nations, including the endless promotion of women’s ‘rights’ and women’s issues. If we fail, then many more countries will end up falling prey to the insanities and moral filth that are currently de-constructing what used to be referred to (in the “good old days”) as the “leader of the free world” and a “beacon of democracy”.